Supreme Court will Hear Standing Issue in JobsOhio Case

A divided Ohio Supreme Court agreed to hear proposition of law number 3, the standing issue,  in ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio, 2012-1272.  Docket.  Here is a  Plain Dealer article on the decision. There is an interesting pro-standing amicus brief by the conservative group, the  1851 Center. Besides the standing issue, appellant’s other propositions of law […]

Supreme Court will Hear Standing Issue in JobsOhio Case Read Post »

Oral Argument: Constitutionality of Requiring Direct Appeal to Supreme Court of Denial of Postconviction DNA Test in Death Penalty Case

Does a provision of the DNA testing statute violate the Ohio Constitution (Article IV, sections 2(B)(2)(c) and 3(B)(2)) by mandating that the denial of applications for postconviction DNA testing in death penalty cases must be appealed directly to the Supreme Court of Ohio rather than to an intermediate court of appeals?  Oral argument preview. State

Oral Argument: Constitutionality of Requiring Direct Appeal to Supreme Court of Denial of Postconviction DNA Test in Death Penalty Case Read Post »

Court Could Not Apply Open Courts Provision to Equine Actitivities Immunity Statute Because Parties did not Raise the Issue

Smith v. Landfair, 2012 -Ohio- 5692, 12/6/12, This case was NOT decided on open courts provision of the Ohio Constitution, Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 16, because the parties did not raise the issue in briefs or oral arguments.  According to the dissent, R.C. 2305.321 , the equine activities immunity statute, violates the Ohio Constitution,

Court Could Not Apply Open Courts Provision to Equine Actitivities Immunity Statute Because Parties did not Raise the Issue Read Post »

Statute Requiring Preserving Biological Evidence in Possession of Government at Effective Date of Statute did not invoke Retroactivity Clause

State v  Roberts, 2012 -Ohio- 5684, 12/6/12, The obligation to preserve and catalog criminal-offense-related biological evidence imposed upon certain government entities by R.C. 2933.82 applies to evidence in the possession of those entities at the time of the statute’s effective date.  Applying the statute to evidence in possession of the government does not amount to

Statute Requiring Preserving Biological Evidence in Possession of Government at Effective Date of Statute did not invoke Retroactivity Clause Read Post »

Medical Malpractice Statute of Repose Does Not Violate Open Courts Provision

Ruther v. Kaiser,2012-Ohio-5685, The medical-malpractice statute of repose found in R.C. 2305.113(C) does not extinguish a vested right and thus does not violate the open courts provision, Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 16. (Hardy v. VerMeulen, 32 Ohio St.3d 45, 512 N.E.2d 626 (1987), overruled.)

Medical Malpractice Statute of Repose Does Not Violate Open Courts Provision Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court Decisions re. Retroactivity and Adam Walsh Act

In re Bruce S., 2012-Ohio-5696 Senate Bill 10’s (Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act) classification, registration, and community-notification provisions cannot be constitutionally applied to a sex offender who committed his sex offense between July 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, the last day before January 1, 2008, the effective date of S.B 10’s classification, registration, and community-notification

Ohio Supreme Court Decisions re. Retroactivity and Adam Walsh Act Read Post »

Scroll to Top