Ohio Supreme Court Decisions

Ohio Supreme Court Strikes Down Peace Officer Sexual Battery Law

The Ohio Supreme Court issued a 4-3 decision in State v. Mole, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5124, on July 28, 2016. The issue before the Court was whether R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) violated the equal protection clause of the United States and Ohio constitutions. The felony sexual battery statute prohibited sexual conduct by a peace office with a […]

Ohio Supreme Court Strikes Down Peace Officer Sexual Battery Law Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court: School Boards Not Protected by Retroactivity Clause

In Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn., the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Article II, Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution, providing protection against retroactive laws, only applies to individuals and private corporations, not to local governments. The case arose out of funding reductions made by the Ohio Department

Ohio Supreme Court: School Boards Not Protected by Retroactivity Clause Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court Rules Presumption of Voluntariness Violates Juveniles’ Rights

In an opinion issued April 28, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that R.C. 2933.81(B) violates the due process rights of juveniles. The law presumes that a juvenile suspect’s statements made while in police custody are voluntary, if they are electronically recorded. In State v. Barker, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-2 decision that

Ohio Supreme Court Rules Presumption of Voluntariness Violates Juveniles’ Rights Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court: Standing to Challenge Gambling Amendment

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Frederick Kinsey, one of the parties in State ex rel. Walgate v. Kasich, has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a 2009 voter-approved amendment to the Ohio Constitution that permits limited casino and “racino” gambling operations. In order to have standing, the Court requires a plaintiff to show that

Ohio Supreme Court: Standing to Challenge Gambling Amendment Read Post »

Youngstown Anti-Fracking Charter Amendment Must Be on Ballot, Ohio Supreme Court Says

The Ohio Supreme Court held that a “Community Bill of Rights” charter amendment, which would ban fracking in Youngstown, must go on the ballot.  See Alliance Review, Court orders anti-fracking issue back on ballot in Youngstown  The Mahoning County Board of Elections had refused to put it on the ballot, stating that it was contrary

Youngstown Anti-Fracking Charter Amendment Must Be on Ballot, Ohio Supreme Court Says Read Post »

City Charter Can Not Require More Signatures for Ballot Issue Than Ohio Constitution

State ex rel. Wilen v. Kent, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3763. A city charter can not require a higher number of signatures in order to get a proposed charter amendment on the ballot than what is required by the Ohio Constitution Article XVIII, Section 9.  Docket. See Cleveland.com  Ohio Supreme Court rules Kent officials unconstitutionally blocked

City Charter Can Not Require More Signatures for Ballot Issue Than Ohio Constitution Read Post »

County Charters Restricting Oil and Gas Operations will not be on the Ballot

State ex rel. Walker v. Husted, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3749.  In determining whether a petition to adopt a county charter can be placed on the ballot, the Secretary of State may not deny the petition because it believes provisions of the charters would violate the Ohio Constitution by unconstitutionally interfering with the state’s exclusive authority

County Charters Restricting Oil and Gas Operations will not be on the Ballot Read Post »

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds

The Ohio Supreme Court held that an extraterritorial search, prohibited by RC 4513.39, can violate the Ohio Constitution’s provision against search and seizures, Ohio Constitution, Art. I, Section 14, even though the search did not violate the U.S. Constitution as there was probable cause for the search.  See CourtNewsOhio, Officer Had No Authority to Make

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds Read Post »

Scroll to Top