federal vs. ohio constitution

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds

The Ohio Supreme Court held that an extraterritorial search, prohibited by RC 4513.39, can violate the Ohio Constitution’s provision against search and seizures, Ohio Constitution, Art. I, Section 14, even though the search did not violate the U.S. Constitution as there was probable cause for the search.  See CourtNewsOhio, Officer Had No Authority to Make […]

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court holds Ohio Constitution Affords More Due Process Rights than U.S. Constitution

In State v. Bode, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-1519, the Ohio Supreme Court in a 4-3 decision held that a defendant’s juvenile adjudication of delinquency for DUI could not enhance the penalty for a later adult sentence for DUI, when there was no defense counsel at the juvenile adjudication, and there was no waiver of the

Ohio Supreme Court holds Ohio Constitution Affords More Due Process Rights than U.S. Constitution Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court to Decide Whether Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution

In State v. Brown, 6th Dist. No. WD-12-070, 2013-Ohio-5351, the Sixth District Court of Appeals found that evidence obtained from a traffic stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction had to be excluded pursuant to Art. I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution, which prohibits unlawful searches and seizures.  The search and seizure did not violate the

Ohio Supreme Court to Decide Whether Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court Holds Police Reasonably Relied on Invalid Warrants, Dissent Says Ohio Constitution May Have Offered Defendant More Protection

A police officer requested warrants for the arrest of Brandon Hoffman for house stripping.  The request set forth the elements of the offense, name of suspect and location of offense, but contained no facts as to why officers suspected Hoffman of house stripping.  A Toledo Municipal Court magistrate issued the warrants based on the request

Ohio Supreme Court Holds Police Reasonably Relied on Invalid Warrants, Dissent Says Ohio Constitution May Have Offered Defendant More Protection Read Post »

Pfeiffer’s Dissent Expresses Surprise at Failure of Lawyers to Raise State Constitutional Issues

​In an article I wrote for the June 2014 issue of The Cleveland Bar Journal, entitled, “A Free Online Guide for Researching the Ohio Constitution”, I discuss why knowledge of the Ohio Constitution is important for Ohio lawyers and law students.   A recent dissent by Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer drives this

Pfeiffer’s Dissent Expresses Surprise at Failure of Lawyers to Raise State Constitutional Issues Read Post »

Scroll to Top