Uncategorized

Ohio Supreme Court: Standing to Challenge Gambling Amendment

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Frederick Kinsey, one of the parties in State ex rel. Walgate v. Kasich, has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a 2009 voter-approved amendment to the Ohio Constitution that permits limited casino and “racino” gambling operations. In order to have standing, the Court requires a plaintiff to show that

Ohio Supreme Court: Standing to Challenge Gambling Amendment Read Post »

Proposed Amendment

 Senator Sandra Williams has recently introduced a Senate Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to the Ohio Constitution. Senate Joint Resolution 6 would “amend Section 10 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of Ohio to allow the prosecutor in a felony case to elect to prosecute upon a finding of probable cause by

Proposed Amendment Read Post »

Youngstown Anti-Fracking Charter Amendment Must Be on Ballot, Ohio Supreme Court Says

The Ohio Supreme Court held that a “Community Bill of Rights” charter amendment, which would ban fracking in Youngstown, must go on the ballot.  See Alliance Review, Court orders anti-fracking issue back on ballot in Youngstown  The Mahoning County Board of Elections had refused to put it on the ballot, stating that it was contrary

Youngstown Anti-Fracking Charter Amendment Must Be on Ballot, Ohio Supreme Court Says Read Post »

City Charter Can Not Require More Signatures for Ballot Issue Than Ohio Constitution

State ex rel. Wilen v. Kent, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3763. A city charter can not require a higher number of signatures in order to get a proposed charter amendment on the ballot than what is required by the Ohio Constitution Article XVIII, Section 9.  Docket. See Cleveland.com  Ohio Supreme Court rules Kent officials unconstitutionally blocked

City Charter Can Not Require More Signatures for Ballot Issue Than Ohio Constitution Read Post »

County Charters Restricting Oil and Gas Operations will not be on the Ballot

State ex rel. Walker v. Husted, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3749.  In determining whether a petition to adopt a county charter can be placed on the ballot, the Secretary of State may not deny the petition because it believes provisions of the charters would violate the Ohio Constitution by unconstitutionally interfering with the state’s exclusive authority

County Charters Restricting Oil and Gas Operations will not be on the Ballot Read Post »

Beck Energy Challenges Munroe Falls Zoning Ordinances Which Prohibit Drilling

Beck Energy filed a mandamus action in the Ohio Supreme Court, seeking to vacate a stop work order issued by Munroe Falls to halt work on the Sunoco well.   Beck Energy seeks a declaration that: “The Home Rule Amendment to the Ohio Constitution, Article XVIII,Section 3, does not allow Munroe Falls to enact a zoning

Beck Energy Challenges Munroe Falls Zoning Ordinances Which Prohibit Drilling Read Post »

Cities Disobeying State Traffic Camera Restrictions Will Lose State Funds, Although Restrictions Held Unconstitutional

Ohio’s budget act, HB 64, requires that municipalities operating traffic cameras in violation of state restrictions lose local government funding from the state in the amount equal to the fines collected from the cameras.  The Ohio legislature recently enacted restrictions on traffic cameras, such as requiring police officers to be present, and other restrictions. See SB 342.  Several county

Cities Disobeying State Traffic Camera Restrictions Will Lose State Funds, Although Restrictions Held Unconstitutional Read Post »

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds

The Ohio Supreme Court held that an extraterritorial search, prohibited by RC 4513.39, can violate the Ohio Constitution’s provision against search and seizures, Ohio Constitution, Art. I, Section 14, even though the search did not violate the U.S. Constitution as there was probable cause for the search.  See CourtNewsOhio, Officer Had No Authority to Make

Ohio Constitution Affords More Protection Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures Than U.S. Constitution, Ohio Supreme Court Holds Read Post »

Scroll to Top